Started By
Message
re: Which Tourney team should have been replaced by the SEC snubs?
Posted on 3/19/16 at 3:58 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 3/19/16 at 3:58 pm to ReauxlTide222
Yes. We should've gotten in instead of Vandy. That's it.
1
Posted on 3/19/16 at 4:05 pm to theGarnetWay
Do you think SC could have beat Wichita State?
I think that team should have been a 10 seed, minimum. That is certainly a much better team than half the big 12 and most of the Pac 12.
I think that team should have been a 10 seed, minimum. That is certainly a much better team than half the big 12 and most of the Pac 12.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News