quote:
So is Bowles in it for a cash payout from the plaintiffs? Because as far as the immediate future of Butch Jones and UT football, his statement is the most damning, yet he isn't a plaintiff.

Even if you subscribe to the theory that he made up the story that Jones told him he was a traitor (and thus committing perjury), why would he also make up the part about Jones calling back to apologize? That makes zero sense.

Without evidence and context, there's no way to determine his motives.

You're acting like someone who's not a party making conflicting statements is unusual or something. You've got a script A by your name. If you follow Alabama news closely, there's a high profile criminal case going on right now where a person not directly involved has given two directly contradictory statements - both times under oath and he's a lawyer.

LINK

People do strange things. You've got to have the full context to find the truth and even then you may still never know why they did it.

The player may well be telling the complete truth and he may also be lying his arse off. I openly admitted my natural disposition to believe one side over the other but my opinion is simply an opinion. It is way too early to know the truth either way.