Started By
Message

re: Why can't Auburn maintain success.

Posted on 2/24/16 at 10:49 am to
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 2/24/16 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Alabama was better in the 90s yes but from Bear to Saban, Auburn was the overall better program for sure


Define what you mean by "better program for sure".

Bama had a national title during that time. AU did not. Auburn won 4 SEC titles during that time to Bama's 3. head to head AU had a 14-10 advantage during that stretch (which included 6 different coaches at Bama and 3 different coaches at AU).

As many AU fans proudly (and rightly) cling to their 2010 national title and say they wouldn't trade the roller coaster with a title for consistency without a title, I wouldn't trade the 1992 national title for a .500 record against AU from Bear to Saban.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30927 posts
Posted on 2/24/16 at 11:27 am to
quote:


Define what you mean by "better program for sure".


More SEC titles, more wins, more conference wins, more head to head wins, more perfect seasons.

Yea you got your title in 92 we were just as good in 04 and got screwed in 83 as well. 93 was also awesome.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter