Started By
Message

re: Gamecocks lock down $71.5 million, 10 year deal, with Under Armor ....

Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37857 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Auburn does


I'm pretty sure that you are incorrect. SCAR has a bigger Under Armor deal, alone, than Auburn.

No, it's going to be Bama with Nike I'm fairly sure but I dunno ... that's why I'm asking.
Posted by AUCatfish
How are yah now?
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

SCAR has a bigger Under Armor deal, alone, than Auburn.


Wrong
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141005 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:22 pm to
Unlike most schools, we don't take cash from Nike.

We take equipment and clothing from them and then get royalties (14% for everything but shoes).

I think it's always been like this with us and Nike so there must be some benefit to it or Foley wouldn't have re-inked a similar deal.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34961 posts
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:23 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter