Started By
Message
re: Why wasn't MSU or OM in play for Marcus Dupree?
Posted on 2/14/16 at 6:17 pm to stomp
Posted on 2/14/16 at 6:17 pm to stomp
Easy answer: Because they sucked at football while OU under Switzer was equivalent to the Pete Carroll USC teams. OU was always among the top two or three teams in the country and was a perennial national championship contender led by a charismatic and very likeable coach. Why would any top recruit pick Ole Miss or Mississippi State over those guys?
2
Posted on 2/14/16 at 7:12 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Easy answer: Because they sucked at football while OU under Switzer was equivalent to the Pete Carroll USC teams. OU was always among the top two or three teams in the country and was a perennial national championship contender led by a charismatic and very likeable coach. Why would any top recruit pick Ole Miss or Mississippi State over those guys?
I'm speaking specifically on the Mississippi schools. Of course the top teams in the country will be in play. But why USM over Ole Miss/Mississippi State. Seems both MSU and OM would be in bigger play than USM.
Posted on 2/14/16 at 8:12 pm to Bench McElroy
OU under Switzer was equivalent to the Pete Carroll USC teams. OU was always among the top two or three teams in the country and was a perennial national championship contender led by a charismatic and very likeable coach.
People today joke about the wishbone but if you've got a quarterback who's willing to play with abandon and sell the keeper every time, its devastating. Bone QBs take a beating though, I wouldn't my kid playing for a wishbone coach.
People today joke about the wishbone but if you've got a quarterback who's willing to play with abandon and sell the keeper every time, its devastating. Bone QBs take a beating though, I wouldn't my kid playing for a wishbone coach.
This post was edited on 2/14/16 at 8:15 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News