Started By
Message
re: So I thought Bama returned a lot of contributing players next season?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:31 pm to GermantownTiger
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:31 pm to GermantownTiger
People check out lots of statistical prediction methods for college football, none of which really work. But any system that last year produced these whoppers is probably worse than useless:
117 - Washington (43% O, 44% D, 44% OVR)
#116 - Alabama (26% O, 64% D, 45% OVR)
#110 - Florida State (38% O, 60% D, 49% OVR)
#103 - Iowa (43% O, 59% D, 51% OVR)
#102 - Clemson (64% O, 40% D, 52% OR)
...well, maybe by standing the stats on end and using the obverse, less-experience=higher-finish, would work.
Why are stats that are clearly of no use in identifying historical team success worth posting here?
And any stat that shows Alabama last in the SEC and 104th in the nation probably should be disregarded right off the bat... at least in my opinion.
117 - Washington (43% O, 44% D, 44% OVR)
#116 - Alabama (26% O, 64% D, 45% OVR)
#110 - Florida State (38% O, 60% D, 49% OVR)
#103 - Iowa (43% O, 59% D, 51% OVR)
#102 - Clemson (64% O, 40% D, 52% OR)
...well, maybe by standing the stats on end and using the obverse, less-experience=higher-finish, would work.
Why are stats that are clearly of no use in identifying historical team success worth posting here?
And any stat that shows Alabama last in the SEC and 104th in the nation probably should be disregarded right off the bat... at least in my opinion.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 1:33 pm
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News