Started By
Message

re: Election 2016

Posted on 2/8/16 at 6:32 pm to
Posted by TideCPA
Member since Jan 2012
10419 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Nothing in that link said he disagreed. Did you actually watch the video with Paul talking? He said you won't find anybody in the election that's close to a libertarian (now that Rand is out). The part the said he favored Sanders was inaccurate and speculation. The interviewer said no way in hell would libertarians would move to Sanders and Paul said well he actually does have some libertarian views (which he does) but in no way would Paul side with Sanders. And Ron Paul isn't the end all be all when it comes to lbertarianism anyways. I actually like Rand better than his dad.


I don't know how you gathered that I said or inferred Ron Paul thinks Bernie Sanders is libertarian, or even close to Rand for that matter. I was responding to the contention that Bernie Sanders is the "opposite" of Rand Paul, which is demonstrably false given their overlap on a number of key issues.

quote:

To switch from Paul to Sanders is moronic.


I disagree. For someone who is strongly libertarian leaning with regard to certain social issues (anti war on drugs, pro criminal justice reform, DGAF about gay marriage, anti foreign adventurism, and pro privacy), yet may be largely indifferent on centralized tax and benefit structures (income taxes, healthcare, education, welfare), Bernie could potentially represent the most viable alternative to Rand Paul. I would think the number of people who fall into that group is fairly limited, but it's far from "moronic" to assume such a person doesn't exist.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 6:34 pm
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29098 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

To switch from Paul to Sanders is moronic


You used a lot of words to not argue or disprove this point.

Sure you can point to a couple issues here and there on everybody's viewpoints that match up. Hell, on isidewith I matched with Bernie over candidates I would vote for in a heartbeat. Hillary was still above Bush for me.

Bernie's economic stances are so starkly different from the Pauls that they aren't in the same stratosphere. One of them is literally the representation of the government in Atlas Shrugged and the other is almost John Gault.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 8:28 pm
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46251 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

I don't know how you gathered that I said or inferred Ron Paul thinks Bernie Sanders is libertarian, or even close to Rand for that matter. I was responding to the contention that Bernie Sanders is the "opposite" of Rand Paul, which is demonstrably false given their overlap on a number of key issues.

I never said you said that. You're right in saying Bernie's stances aren't the complete opposite from Paul. The issue I had was you seemed to imply that Paul would support Sanders over the other republican candidates. Maybe I jumped the gun there.

quote:

yet may be largely indifferent on centralized tax and benefit structures

Like I said morons.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter