Started By
Message

re: ***Coaching changes discussion***

Posted on 2/24/16 at 7:59 am to
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 2/24/16 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Sure it is. They sign and recruit the kid.


But they're compelled to take 5* risks because of how cutthroat their industry is. They have to show results immediately. In other industries, like insurance, you can carefully avoid adverse selection by forgoing immediate top-line results for a more stable base and better bottom-line a decade later. Coaches of teams like A&M don't have that luxury, so they have to be gamblers.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34346 posts
Posted on 2/24/16 at 8:11 am to
quote:

But they're compelled to take 5* risks because of how cutthroat their industry is. They have to show results immediately. In other industries, like insurance, you can carefully avoid adverse selection by forgoing immediate top-line results for a more stable base and better bottom-line a decade later. Coaches of teams like A&M don't have that luxury, so they have to be gamblers.


Fair enough.
Posted by NanosTacoRun
Member since Jun 2015
3042 posts
Posted on 2/24/16 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Coaches of teams like A&M don't have that luxury, so they have to be gamblers.

I feel like we let Sherman go this route, he just couldn't produce on the field, and wasn't a good fit moving forward to the SEC
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter