Started By
Message

re: ***Coaching changes discussion***

Posted on 2/24/16 at 12:16 am to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34346 posts
Posted on 2/24/16 at 12:16 am to
quote:

Lol we don't have a roster of sloppy seconds. At some key positions? Yes. Depth wise? Yes. But we have a pretty talented starting 22.



Sure, but are they pieces of a cohesive unit? Do we have a cohesive strategy that emphasizes traits of certain players over other traits?

That seems like a no. The offense lost its focus when KK left (are we HUNH? spread? power run?) and it seems Chavis values a different kind of player than Snyder did. Chavis and Mazzone weren't hired because they excelled at the system that the talent in place was recruited to play. They were hired because they are top professionals on their side of the ball (when they have the players they need for their system in place). That is a mismatch that takes years of recruiting to fix.

So yes the roster is very talented, the most talented for A&M in decades, but it is like an isle of misfit toys. And quite frankly too much of the elite talent is gone after next season. Hopefully those misfits lineup and make a bigger splash than the sum of the parts so that way we don't have to reboot everything and start over again.
Posted by NanosTacoRun
Member since Jun 2015
3042 posts
Posted on 2/24/16 at 12:50 am to
It's year 2 of Chavis, after a good 1st year. And Mazzone has a proven track record of improving offenses with players he didn't recruit.


This staff has been improved in a major way. Not sure why people insist on being pessimistic about the season.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter