Started By
Message
re: Will Georgia's administration buy in like Alabama?
Posted on 1/24/16 at 8:01 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 1/24/16 at 8:01 pm to djsdawg
Oh good lord.
You are trying everything to justify changing UGAs policy. It will not happen!
There is no reason for it to. I know you love litin up and all. But deal with it. Ga will not and should not change its laws and policies. You can take your liberal butt out west for al I care.
But to your point, if a player gets caught underage drinking , there are reprecusssions.
And why in Hell would you want a player playing drunk, much less high? Embarrassment!
Ie... Look at the Athlete handbook, if the student is athlete is caught underage drinking they can be suspended from competiton. And if a second offense they are suspended from UGA from 1 semester. (Now I think the coach should of course make his best decision for first offenses)
But the NCAA requires random drug testing and a policy, not breathalyzers.
You are trying everything to justify changing UGAs policy. It will not happen!
There is no reason for it to. I know you love litin up and all. But deal with it. Ga will not and should not change its laws and policies. You can take your liberal butt out west for al I care.
But to your point, if a player gets caught underage drinking , there are reprecusssions.
And why in Hell would you want a player playing drunk, much less high? Embarrassment!
Ie... Look at the Athlete handbook, if the student is athlete is caught underage drinking they can be suspended from competiton. And if a second offense they are suspended from UGA from 1 semester. (Now I think the coach should of course make his best decision for first offenses)
But the NCAA requires random drug testing and a policy, not breathalyzers.
3
Posted on 1/24/16 at 8:11 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Dude, your Administration just fired a solid 10 win per season coach. It's obvious they want change in the football program. They better be willing to do everything in their power to give Kirby all the resources needed to bring championships to UGA. If that means easing up on the drug policies then so be it.
Posted on 1/24/16 at 8:29 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Pointing out the absurdity your rape comparison is far from "everything."
How can you say it will not happen under smart when it already happened under richt? Quit avoiding that fact.
Since it already happened, there are obviously good reasons to change it.
To my point, I was specific about "testing" for underage drinking like we do for smoking weed, and you avoided that as well.
No one has said anything about players playing inebriated. It happens off the field in time off.
Ncaa only tests prior to championships, so we choose how it's done.
How can you say it will not happen under smart when it already happened under richt? Quit avoiding that fact.
Since it already happened, there are obviously good reasons to change it.
To my point, I was specific about "testing" for underage drinking like we do for smoking weed, and you avoided that as well.
No one has said anything about players playing inebriated. It happens off the field in time off.
Ncaa only tests prior to championships, so we choose how it's done.
Posted on 1/25/16 at 11:12 am to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
And why in Hell would you want a player playing drunk, much less high? Embarrassment!
Jesus Christ.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News