Started By
Message

re: How does Bama's current run compare to other dynasties in their prime?

Posted on 12/16/15 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

If Bama were to win the Title this season, then it would be a for-sure #2 best dynasty of the modern era, and they'd be well on their way to equaling Miami's impressive dynasty.
Miami's dynasty runs 20 freaking years even with major rebuilding in between? And Bama won a Natty in that period...against Miami. So, can our dynasty go back to '92? Or back to Bear? I don't see why not
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Miami's dynasty runs 20 freaking years even with major rebuilding in between? And Bama won a Natty in that period...against Miami. So, can our dynasty go back to '92? Or back to Bear? I don't see why not


Again, Miami's "down" years were a 5-year stretch in which they finished in the Top 20 in 4 out of the 5 seasons. I don't think that was ever bad enough to say the dynasty ended since it picked right back up in 2000 and saw another 4 consecutive years of Top 5 finishes.

During this "down" period (1995-1999), Miami was 13th nationally in weekly AP Poll appearances, so its not like they were irrelevant.

To try to liken Miami's "down" years to Bama's down years between the Stallings years and when Saban rebuilt Bama is a joke.

From 1997-2007, Bama went through an 11-year period that included just three Top 25 finishes... none of them consecutive. It also included four losing seasons.

That's far different than Miami's 5 "down" years which included four Top 20 finishes. Not even close to the same thing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter