Started By
Message
re: Still mad about the Iron Bowl, au decides to go after Harvey for payments
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:56 am to lsufball19
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:56 am to lsufball19
quote:
it's restitution, not a fine. restitution, by definition, is not excessive
Restitution is also generally for objects that have easily identifiable fair market values (ie a house, a car, a plane, money, stocks, etc).
There is no readily available market for old oak trees. They clearly took the highest value for every input available and nobody could really argue with it because it is an ESTIMATE.
Again, whatever, I wouldn't defend the guy, but to argue that this is the normal cost for a big old oak tree to be replaced is silly.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 12:02 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Restitution is also generally for objects that have easily identifiable fair market values
someone throws an axe through a 300 year old painting. now put a value on a unique and one of a kind piece of art that has never been sold at auction. i mean you can buy some oil paint, brushes, and a canvas for $150
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)