Started By
Message
re: Still mad about the Iron Bowl, au decides to go after Harvey for payments
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:50 am to AU24
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:50 am to AU24
quote:
If someone destroyed your property. Would you want them to pay for it?
I've never seen an oak tree worth almost $800,000.00. He should have appealed the price gouging judge's ruling. The tree would have to have been made of gold. It wasn't like the trees were making the university money. The actual value of that oak if it were cut for the wood would be roughly $100.00. I could see the judge upping the value to teach him a lesson but it should have been $5,000 not $800,000. he should have poisoned the eagle it would have been cheaper
This post was edited on 12/3/15 at 11:54 am
3
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:52 am to swinetime
quote:
I've never seen an oak tree worth almost $800,000.00. He should have appealed the price gouging judge's ruling. The tree would have to have been made of gold. The actual value of that oak if it were cut for the wood would be roughly $100.00. I could see the judge upping the value to teach him a lesson but it should have been $5,000 not $800,000
Well shite, if someone burns your house we'll just estimate restitution based on the value of the scrap remnants, deal?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:53 am to swinetime
quote:
I've never seen an oak tree worth almost $800,000.00.
No one cares he got an unfair estimate. frick that guy
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:58 am to swinetime
quote:
I've never seen an oak tree worth almost $800,000.00.
Honestly, I think the judge did an assessment of all the real estate that Auburn owns in Harvey's head and determined what a fair rent would be.
$100/month in perpetuity sounds like a good deal for Harvey.
I will give Harvey credit though...
Some of his trolls are pretty funny:
LINK
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News