quote:
quote:
LSU and 'Bama have been a problem. Auburn? Seriously?
Yes, seriously. AU's classes have been right on par with aTm's the last 3 years and they've won the SEC and played in the NC game recently.

OP: Why have TAMU's recruiting classes produced so little success?

Answer: Because LSU, Bama, Auburn

The "Answer" implies that "Auburn" is a causative agent in TAMU's "lack of success." That is not the case.

Auburn had one good year, during which they beat the Aggies by an overwhelming 4 points. I congratulate them for their success that year, but they are not (in any way) a factor in TAMU's struggles.

TAMU has played Auburn three times since joining the league. Auburn won one close game, TAMU won one close game, and one game TAMU pummeled Auburn like a redheaded stepchild.

TAMU has had problems. LSU and 'Bama are certainly two of those problems. Auburn is not.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RB10

Member since Nov 2010

44306 posts

Posted on 10/30/15 at 11:28 am to AggieHank86

quote:
The "Answer" implies that "Auburn" is a causative agent in TAMU's "lack of success." That is not the case.

AU is in the same division and has recruited at the exact same level. Saying they are not a factor is ignorant.

quote:
Auburn had one good year, during which they beat the Aggies by an overwhelming 4 points. I congratulate them for their success that year, but they are not (in any way) a factor in TAMU's struggles.

Again, ignorant.

quote:
TAMU has played Auburn three times since joining the league. Auburn won one close game, TAMU won one close game, and one game TAMU pummeled Auburn like a redheaded stepchild.

So? AU has hardware, aTm doesn't. The moral victories you're reaching to obtain are making you look dumb.