I can understood the appeal for a former player, or if just want more money.

But it still the same game and my view is Clemson is better location for recruiting. If Clemson wins the ACC most years it will also make the playoffs. Clemson has as nice of football facilities as Alabama. Clemson has won a title here before so it can be done.

I am surprised to see people act like it is crazy or trolling to be surprised ppl see Bama as a superior coaching job even disregarding the extra money.

Alabama is a better high school football state then south carolina.

Alabama's campus is nicer then clemson's.

Alabama facilities are top 3 nationally.

Alabama's stadium is much bigger then clemson's.

what is nicer at clemson? give a valid point

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jamie Lannister

Member since Jun 2015

2143 posts

Posted on 10/30/15 at 10:03 pm to assassin18

quote:
Alabama's campus is nicer then clemson's. Alabama facilities are top 3 nationally. Alabama's stadium is much bigger then clemson's

lol at Alabama's campus is nicer. It is in flat area not near mountains or ocean. I street viewed it on Google maps and didn't looking appealing outside of a few areas.

How do you rank facilities? Obvious Clemson's facilities are good enough if we get Sammy Watkins, Deshuan Watson, other players recruited by Bama.

Clemson's stadium can hold 82,000. that seems big enough. bigger stadium means more traffic after the game to sit in. no thanks.

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board