I never said it was dominant. (Historically it is a terrible record for us against South Carolina) Just wanted to point out that your number was wrong.

Generally when you seek to troll a team that just beat your team by over 30 you try to get your numbers correct right?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by scrooster

Resident Ethicist

Member since Jul 2012

37742 posts

Posted on 10/28/15 at 3:06 pm to Dawg in Beaumont

quote:
I never said it was dominant. (Historically it is a terrible record for us against South Carolina) Just wanted to point out that your number was wrong.

Generally when you seek to troll a team that just beat your team by over 30 you try to get your numbers correct right?

Kids don't care about that historical stuff ... they care about everything from about the time they are 12 years old and start paying attention a little bit ... and then they are recruitable around the age of 17-18 or so.

So let's say six years are what really matters.

Richt/UGA is 3-3 vs SCAR in the past six years.

Generally when UGA fans seek to troll a team that they are just 3-3 against over the past six years ... including a 35-7 beatdown loss on national TV where they avoided a shutout by the grace of the HBC feeling sorry for Richt ... you try to get your USCreal vs USCjr trolling correct, amirite?

Just saying, some of your UGA dawgettes have been laying it on a little thick and heavy lately, have they not? For no reason in particular ... unless they are reapplying for rivalry status ... amirite?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CNB