re: 2004 Alabama vs. Auburn Highlights

Just to prove how terrible a point that is, we lost worse to UGA and LSU in 2003 than we did to USC, how'd that work out for them in 2004?

As for the second part of your post, I don't think anyone doubts that. However, what does that say about the legitimacy of the system when "intrigue" matters more than reality?

Like I posted yesterday I understand somebody had to get left out. I just wish they would have said "we feel like like USC and Oklahoma are the two best teams". Even though they wouldn't have had any good argument other than opinion to back that up I could at least respect. It was/is the ridiculous attempts to justify their opinion that irk me to this day. Bringing up our schedule (which was the most difficult), what happened in 2003 (which is completely irrelevant), or the fact we had one bad half the entire season (when USC had multiple games where they struggled against bad teams) is just pathetic.

The whole thing is/was a joke.