Started By
Message

re: McEachern 48 - Tucker 7 .........at HALFTIME

Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:10 pm to
Posted by Usey
EC
Member since Jul 2013
484 posts
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:10 pm to
Hokeman is a better QB than Eason.

If we don't sign him he will end up at UT, SC, or Bama.

That guy is a stud. Smooth as silk and throws a very nice ball. WINNER
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86556 posts
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Hokeman is a better QB than Eason.



just out of curiosity, what do you base this on?
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7010 posts
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:21 pm to
Who the hell is Hokeman? Hockman is a very good QB but whether of not he is better than Eason is not apparent. Eason goes through his progressions better but Hockman is a better mover. Both have strong arms with quick releases.
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15666 posts
Posted on 8/24/15 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Hokeman is a better QB than Eason. If we don't sign him he will end up at UT, SC, or Bama. That guy is a stud. Smooth as silk and throws a very nice ball. WINNER
.


Hockman is a hell of a QB no doubt about it but you should go back and watch Eason on tape. Eason goes thru 2 or 3 progressions on almost every single play. That is some high level stuff for a young qb. Huston Mason rarely went thru more than 2 progressions as a 5th year senior. Eason is a damn beast and will be a good one and Hockman is absolutly a slick QB with a great arm. Love them both.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter