Started By
Message
re: Group accuses Mark Richt of using “public office” to raise money for Christian..
Posted on 8/21/15 at 5:41 pm to DawgsLife
Posted on 8/21/15 at 5:41 pm to DawgsLife
So, as we have seen in this thread, a relatively small sect within the Christian religion, which has a major fundamental difference from its primary population, has been allowed to operate and recruit within the Athletic department and is lead, in part, by people who make decisions within the University. It has also been divisive due to its own doctrine which is clear to its members only.
I know y'all think you are 100% without question right... We don't need to argue that as it is pointless for this issue any further.
I personally don't care, but am not surprised that some do and frankly, they have a case...
I know y'all think you are 100% without question right... We don't need to argue that as it is pointless for this issue any further.
I personally don't care, but am not surprised that some do and frankly, they have a case...
Posted on 8/21/15 at 5:52 pm to Peter Buck
I guess I can live with a bit of mindless indoctrination as long as our guys don't copy Tennessee players and start fondling rattle snakes.
Posted on 8/21/15 at 7:49 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
So, as we have seen in this thread, a relatively small sect within the Christian religion,
Are you talking about the FCA? Then yes, the FCA has meetings that the athletes can attend if they so choose.
quote:
which has a major fundamental difference from its primary population,
No, they don't. ALL Christians believe that separate from Jesus one cannot get into heaven. That is the basic tenet of Christianity. To claim otherwise is to not be a Christian.
quote:
and is lead, in part, by people who make decisions within the University.
Where was this said? I missed it. Richt hired his brother-in-law. His brother-in-law, apparently runs the FCA program.
quote:
I know y'all think you are 100% without question right.
Of course we do. Don't you believe you are right? if you don't, why are we arguing?
quote:
personally don't care, but am not surprised that some do and frankly, they have a case...
If they were being forced to attend, then I would say yes...the group has a case. But, nowhere does it say that they are being forced to attend.
I mean...are all the players being forced to go to the pool party, or the horse back riding? if so, do you find this objectionable and sinister?
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News