Started By
Message

re: Group accuses Mark Richt of using “public office” to raise money for Christian..

Posted on 8/21/15 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12415 posts
Posted on 8/21/15 at 5:41 pm to
So, as we have seen in this thread, a relatively small sect within the Christian religion, which has a major fundamental difference from its primary population, has been allowed to operate and recruit within the Athletic department and is lead, in part, by people who make decisions within the University. It has also been divisive due to its own doctrine which is clear to its members only.

I know y'all think you are 100% without question right... We don't need to argue that as it is pointless for this issue any further.

I personally don't care, but am not surprised that some do and frankly, they have a case...
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7010 posts
Posted on 8/21/15 at 5:52 pm to
I guess I can live with a bit of mindless indoctrination as long as our guys don't copy Tennessee players and start fondling rattle snakes.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58925 posts
Posted on 8/21/15 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

So, as we have seen in this thread, a relatively small sect within the Christian religion,


Are you talking about the FCA? Then yes, the FCA has meetings that the athletes can attend if they so choose.

quote:

which has a major fundamental difference from its primary population,


No, they don't. ALL Christians believe that separate from Jesus one cannot get into heaven. That is the basic tenet of Christianity. To claim otherwise is to not be a Christian.

quote:

and is lead, in part, by people who make decisions within the University.


Where was this said? I missed it. Richt hired his brother-in-law. His brother-in-law, apparently runs the FCA program.

quote:

I know y'all think you are 100% without question right.


Of course we do. Don't you believe you are right? if you don't, why are we arguing?

quote:

personally don't care, but am not surprised that some do and frankly, they have a case...


If they were being forced to attend, then I would say yes...the group has a case. But, nowhere does it say that they are being forced to attend.

I mean...are all the players being forced to go to the pool party, or the horse back riding? if so, do you find this objectionable and sinister?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter