Started By
Message
re: Fall Camp Thread
Posted on 8/19/15 at 4:35 pm to pauliebleaker
Posted on 8/19/15 at 4:35 pm to pauliebleaker
Something tells me you purposely botched the quote situation to cover up your mess.
Anyway..
You said Mauk starts for 2, then it's Drew's team for 3.
There was no 'hope' in there.
You're weird. Adios.
Anyway..
You said Mauk starts for 2, then it's Drew's team for 3.
There was no 'hope' in there.
You're weird. Adios.
1
Posted on 8/19/15 at 5:47 pm to Sleeping Tiger
You guys were all saying the same thing. Yes, I'm sure GP would want Lock for 2 years. But no, he won't get him for 2 years unless he benches Mauk, which I don't see happening as a senior who had already started for 2 years.
I think the point that was being made is that because Lock can leave after 3 years, it's a complete waste to redshirt him. Even if it means he's only playing a series every other weekend, he is getting some field time and practice snaps. With this I agree. Doesn't mean start him, but why redshirt him?
I think the point that was being made is that because Lock can leave after 3 years, it's a complete waste to redshirt him. Even if it means he's only playing a series every other weekend, he is getting some field time and practice snaps. With this I agree. Doesn't mean start him, but why redshirt him?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News