Started By
Message

re: Fall Camp Thread

Posted on 8/19/15 at 2:47 pm to
Posted by pauliebleaker
Chesterfield
Member since Jul 2014
1820 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 2:47 pm to
I'm sure Pinkel wants to redshirt him and let Mauk start the next 2 years. Then it will be Drew's team for the next 3 years. Problem is, as happened with manzel, They can declare after 3 years, redshirt or not. NOt certain he can go early but he certainly has the size. We know Mauk is too short and probably won't be drafted at all.

That means we could lose Lock after just 1 season. what a waste if he is that good.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 3:24 pm to
quote:


I'm sure Pinkel wants to redshirt him and let Mauk start the next 2 years. Then it will be Drew's team for the next 3 years


I hope they don't let you on public roads.
Posted by Koch Snowflake
Columbia, MO
Member since Oct 2013
129 posts
Posted on 8/19/15 at 3:24 pm to
IMO the only way Mauk does not start this year, or gets replaced at all, would be if Printz is the one that consistently shows him up all fall.

Printz has been pretty consistent, made good decisions, and constantly runs against the number 1 defense. But has he done enough to unseat Mauk? I actually think he is much closer than people tend to give him credit for.

I don't think it has anything to do with Lock. I just think that Pinkel doesn't believe in throwing any QB out there as a true freshman. Certainly not when he has several other good options that can win games. Both Mauk and Printz are good options that know the playbook and have experience at the college level.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter