Started By
Message

re: Comparing conferences: A different look

Posted on 8/4/15 at 9:54 pm to
Posted by OU_Fan
Fort Riley
Member since Dec 2014
763 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 9:54 pm to
Mizzou, A&M, South Carolina, and Arkansas are not national championship caliber teams.

If they were, we would have seen them either win or lose in a national title game, which neither has happened in our lifetime. I'm not sold on the Arkansas, Mizzou, A&M bandwagon because these teams fail to bring home the trophy from a historical perspective.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 8/4/15 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Mizzou, A&M, South Carolina, and Arkansas are not national championship caliber


Which would probably be the reason I didn't say they were. What ya think?
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80417 posts
Posted on 8/5/15 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Mizzou, A&M, South Carolina, and Arkansas are not national championship caliber teams.


It took the perfect storm and the ultimate choke job by A&M, Kansas State, and Florida State for Oklahoma to win a title in the 2000 season.

Here's Oklahoma's scoring average in BCS title games:

15 points per game

That INCLUDES their championship win.
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 8/5/15 at 1:24 am to
quote:

because these teams fail to bring home the trophy from a historical perspective.

This is what I love about some fan bases. They get spoiled and think things could never change.

Just because OU won a NC 15 years ago, you thought that OU would still be the who's who and still command national attention.

Did you know that Princeton University has the most NCs of any other program in the NCAA? What happened to them? What happened to Army and Navy? Georgia Tech? Minnesota? Yale?

As you probably know, it's called a paradigm shift. What worked before does not work now, and likely will never work again. The dynamics of college football have forever changed, and not in a good way for the Okies. You needed your overload to keep a thumb on Daddy A&M for you to remain relevant. They did it for many, many decades until A&M just got too big. It had to happen some day. The fricking longhorns couldn't be the 800 lb gorilla forever.

OU, like Princeton, Yale, Minnesota, Navy, etc, is the guy who was the all-district quarter back in your high school who owned the place, had all the girls, drove the nice car, had all the great parties. Dude thought things would NEVER change. He would always rule, right?

15 years later, he's a bald, fat douche still wearing his letterman jacket, working at Walmart. OU, just like baldy, is a has-been program that is squirming and fighting to get bevo's nutless dong out of its mouth so it can try to salvage mid-major level exposure. OU is a Texas-dependent program that has been completely marginalized with no upside, stuck in a shitty conference with no way to leave and nothing to offer.

The program suffering the most from Bowtie Loftin's 100 year screw-job is OU. We destroyed sooner football, and it makes me smile. You deserve it for attaching your mouths to bevy's cock.

Get another past-time, cuz A&M will win 10-20 NCs before OU ever wins another.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter