re: Comparing conferences: A different look

quote:

---

National Title Contenders: Self explanatory. Teams that in any given year can win it all with the right coach in place. 

---

You have the best coach that you're ever going to get and the best that you can do is to get boat raced in the game before the only game that matters, twice.

You put the right pieces in play at Tennessee and it's already been proven that multiple NC's can be done. By multiple coaches. Here's some regurgitated paragraphs that fit you and this thread perfectly.

We've been in the gutter since 2008 and one of the best programs in college football for the 100 years before that. You've been slightly relevant for the last what, 8-9 years? And on the same level as Kentucky for the 100 years prior to that. 

Our programs aren't comparable. UT has a better, much larger fan base, better facilities, attracts better athletes, is more highly regarded by coaches and the media, multiple more national championships, better history, better traditions, I could go on and on. 

Missouri could put up 10+ games a year for another decade with that embarrassing arse schedule and still not garner any respect. You're not respected or accepted in the SEC. You're not respected around the country. Literally nobody gives a frick about Missouri football outside of the small fan base that resides in Missouri.