Started By
Message

re: How come Florida and Georgia cant stop Mizzou from winning East?

Posted on 7/5/15 at 5:48 pm to
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42695 posts
Posted on 7/5/15 at 5:48 pm to
I really don't understand bragging about winning a division. It's a B12 mindset that counts divisions. The SEC has only recently had divisions at all and the only point to having them was 1. we expanded and 2. so that we could have a championship game. Hell, in 2007 Fulmer 'backed into' the SECCG and our fans were pissed off about it because our team wasn't up to snuff and in our eyes didn't really deserve to be there. Winning the East despite the East being strong then was nothing to brag about nor is losing the SECCG.

For the blue blood teams, second place might as well be last.

As for the original question which really does appear to be a troll/ego stroke (bad trolling job kilo - you can do better), there are many reasons Mizzou has been able to win the last two years. It's not really something that can be answered with one or two lines or simply but is rather complicated and requires explanations for each season separately. That said, UGA has been the only one the eastern powers that hasn't been either a dumpster fire or dealing with the wreckage of a disaster reminiscent of the bombing of Dresden.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27439 posts
Posted on 7/5/15 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

For the blue blood teams, second place might as well be last.


Well, 3 blue bloods have finished last then to woeful Missouri 2 of the last 3 years and 2 of 3 years in total for Mizzou in the SEC
However you want to spin it partner is fine by me.
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 6:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter