re: Recruit ranking by scholarship offers

I like and understand the idea, but it's really pretty stupid when uncommitable offers are an offer.

Then there's schools like Alabama that offer 350+ kids just so their name is at the top of the offer list alphabetically and it always makes it seem like Bama is the best offer in the country.

If a kid can't commit and have a roster spot and scholarship reserved for him, it's not an offer.... looking at you Ole Miss.

Also weighting the value of the offer based off the name value of the school.... I get it, but there's not 25 points of difference between Alabama, Clemson, Auburn and then Arkansas.