Started By
Message

re: What will be the first SEC East team to win the SEC championship

Posted on 6/15/15 at 10:38 am to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58925 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 10:38 am to
quote:

But missed replays should not be part of the game, when we have the technology to prevent it.


Then you don't understand what replays are for or the criteria in which the decisions are made. It has to be irrefutable proof or the call on the field stands.

quote:

As far a being mediocre in the SEC. I and most SEC Fans define it as not winning or playing for a National Championship sometime in recent history. What is your definition ?



My definition would be winning big one year, then losing just as big the next. An Auburn tradition! Perhaps you should read the definition instead of making it up as you go along?
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 10:39 am to
As opposed to never winning big?
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33057 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

quote: Then you don't understand what replays are for or the criteria in which the decisions are made. It has to be irrefutable proof or the call on stands.


No doubt the guy knows very little about the rules of the game.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter