Your response may make some sense on a general level but It's not a good point in this specific instance:

1. Not all ref mistakes are equally bad. Depends on how obvious the infraction was obviously. A missed flag on an obvious penalty can indeed be worse than a missed replay that lacked irrefutable evidence.

2. Why was it lacked? Because instant replays are limited due to limited camera views. In no way should they expected to be perfect with such limitations, and To think otherwise is not realistic. If it's not irrefutable, it's supposed to be upheld per the powers that be, and that's exactly what happened. They followed the rule to a T. It's not like they saw irrefutable evidence, and chose to ignore it, which is a key distinction to acknowledge.

3. To whine about one mistake without accepting the other simply isn't one bit reasonable.The way these 2 calls in question are directly related is quite unique compared to your general point, and that essentially renders them "cancelled" out. Fact is, One mistake led to another. Instead of Uga td or au ball on the 1 foot line, which were both wrong, it should be have been Uga ball on the 1 foot line.

This post was edited on 6/15/15 at 1:42 am