re: What will be the first SEC East team to win the SEC championship

I think it's a fair point. Replay is in place to fix certain missed calls. The powers that be deemed that penalties should be left off that list of things replay can overturn. It's unfortunate when calls are missed at full speed. It happens. Refs are looking at certain things and sometimes miss others, no matter how blatant they are to the rest of us watching from much wider angles.

It is definitely worse to see a call missed after replay. I did not go back to see if there was a facemask missed. I do not remember seeing one any time I viewed it, but I wasn't looking at Murray's helmet in those cases. That point plays to why replay misses are worse than live-play missed calls. If the facemask was a reviewable call, the replay official should be looking for it. He WAS looking to see if Murray scored a touchdown. As such, a missed call on replay would mean that someone with the benefit of many angles of the play, even slow-motion angles, failed to see what actually happened. A missed facemask means that one, maybe two, officials missed something live in a bundle of bodies that was definitely not their first priority to see.

Note: I'm not getting into whether this one was or not, no matter my personal opinion. It's ancient history and was made null by later events in the game. I'm simply pointing out why a missed replay call is worse than a missed penalty call.