Started By
Message

re: Slightly different expansion discussion

Posted on 5/18/15 at 4:32 pm to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34342 posts
Posted on 5/18/15 at 4:32 pm to
I like the twist, good thread.

The issue is that there isn't many SEC-ready programs. I agree with you Cinci is as ready for the Power 5 as any program not named BYU, so given that I agree with your choices of ECU and Cincy.

With that said, you have to think if the SEC expands for 15 and 16 without poaching from another Power 5 they are doing it to hit the number and NOT for a network (as those schools probably aren't powerful enough to get in-state rates for the SEC network). So I would say that the restriction of "none of the current states" is probably asking too much.

Take away that one rule and my pick is ECU and UCF. Central Florida is easily the school with the biggest potential of the non-Power 5s.
This post was edited on 5/18/15 at 4:33 pm
Posted by throwingoranges
Member since Jul 2014
555 posts
Posted on 5/18/15 at 4:38 pm to


It was surprising how terrible the choices are. There's a reason why the power 5 are the power 5.

You either have to go for strong programs (probably poaching schools from the existing footprint and putting a very low ceiling on new dollars) or you go for TV sets with less-than-stellar programs.

I opted to explore the latter for this discussion.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
5896 posts
Posted on 5/21/15 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Take away that one rule and my pick is ECU and UCF. Central Florida is easily the school with the biggest potential of the non-Power 5s.



ECU has excellent potential, but they're a geographical outpost. There also the only school in NC that gives a shite about football, so there's that.

Agreed on UCF.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter