Started By
Message
re: Indiana Religious Freedom Bill
Posted on 3/27/15 at 4:37 pm to Duke
Posted on 3/27/15 at 4:37 pm to Duke
quote:
Obviously. Is that a negative? What is the down side of society embracing their lifestyle as legitimate?
Is it an expedient form of the marriage relationship? Will it give more stability to the society or less?
2
Posted on 3/27/15 at 5:31 pm to the808bass
quote:
Is it an expedient form of the marriage relationship?
Two people (or more since adoption is a thing people do) sharing resources to build a family. Seems like a good use of the relationship to me.
quote:
Will it give more stability to the society or less?
Likely won't make a difference. If anything a slight positive of having more families.
What downsides do you foresee?
Posted on 3/27/15 at 5:38 pm to the808bass
quote:
Will it give more stability to the society or less?
In the short term, it would be de-stabilizing due to all the court battles and protests. However that is purely a product of social conservative resistance and not an inherent result of gay marriage. The de-stabilizing effect social conservatives fear is a self-fulfilling prophecy, a scenario which they themselves would create in response.
In the long-term, it would be stabilizing because eventually people will move on, the baby boomers will die off and (hopefully) Christian entities would stop believing it is better for children to grow up without any parents than with gay ones. More families, less money spent fighting it in court on both sides and a populace which can more easily focus on the political issues that matter.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News