So how long do we give Sumlin, since his teams have actually regressed the last 2 years?

I just now saw that a similar point was brought up in another thread but this seems to be the official fire Kennedy thread so I'll leave it here.

This post was edited on 3/24/15 at 6:00 am

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by WhiskerBiscuitSlayer

Member since Jan 2013

13842 posts

Posted on 3/24/15 at 6:50 am to Tecate

Oh my, you bolded regressed. You must really want people to care about what you have to say.

News flash: WE DON'T

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by CGSC Lobotomy

Member since Sep 2011

80415 posts

Posted on 3/24/15 at 7:46 am to Tecate

It would be applicable if Sumlin didn't fire the coaches responsible for the regression. (Anderson and Snyder)

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Farmer1906

The Woodlands, TX

Member since Apr 2009

50701 posts

Posted on 3/24/15 at 8:43 am to Tecate

quote:
So how long do we give Sumlin, since his teams have actually regressed the last 2 years?

It is easy to regress when your the #5 team in the nation. Kennedy is still trying to crack the top 68.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by greenbastard

Parts Unkown

Member since Feb 2014

2740 posts

Posted on 3/24/15 at 11:24 am to Tecate

quote:
So how long do we give Sumlin, since his teams have actually regressed the last 2 years?

Sumlin has improved recruiting and completely revamped our image into a nationally relevant team. Let's face it, we haven't mattered this much since the 90's. I'd give Sumlin 2 more solid years since he has shown what he can do with a decent defense (year 1). It'll take time, but I think our future looks bright.

Kennedy on the other hand...

that fool. He took a tournament team and has kept it out of the tournament in a league that is considered weak. I don't expect to beat Kentucky, but I do expect a damn tournament bid. He has finally started recruiting well, but that doesn't matter since he can only coach Kennedy Specials