Started By
Message
re: How would Missouri have fared if both new teams came in in '92?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:52 am to MrTwoBits
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:52 am to MrTwoBits
Mizzou football in the 1990s
1990: 4-7 (2-6)
1991: 3-7-1 (1-7)
1992: 3-8 (2-5)
1993: 3-7-1 (2-5)
1994: 3-8-1 (2-5)
1995: 3-8 (1-6)
1996: 5-6 (3-5)
1997: 7-5 (5-3), L - Holiday Bowl, ranked #23 in the AP Poll
1998: 8-4 (5-3), W - Insight.com Bowl, ranked #21 in the AP Poll
1999: 4-7 (2-6)
tl;dr version: Mizzou football was hot garbage in the 1990s and would have been the whipping boys of the SEC East, sans Vanderbilt.
1990: 4-7 (2-6)
1991: 3-7-1 (1-7)
1992: 3-8 (2-5)
1993: 3-7-1 (2-5)
1994: 3-8-1 (2-5)
1995: 3-8 (1-6)
1996: 5-6 (3-5)
1997: 7-5 (5-3), L - Holiday Bowl, ranked #23 in the AP Poll
1998: 8-4 (5-3), W - Insight.com Bowl, ranked #21 in the AP Poll
1999: 4-7 (2-6)
tl;dr version: Mizzou football was hot garbage in the 1990s and would have been the whipping boys of the SEC East, sans Vanderbilt.
1
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:54 am to Tornado Alley
quote:
Mizzou football was hot garbage in the 1990s and would have been the whipping boys of the SEC East, sans Vanderbilt.
But that has already been established multiple times by Mizzou fans.
Confused...
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News