Started By
Message

re: How would Missouri have fared if both new teams came in in '92?

Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:38 am to
Posted by MrTwoBits
Member since Oct 2013
657 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:38 am to
quote:

I'm tired of the "blue bloods" whining on why they couldn't win the past 2 years


Who's whining? I was very clear in the OP that missouri has done remarkably well in the SEC, and was just curious how they would've done if they were here when the divisions formed.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67517 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Who's whining?

Seriously? You ain't new to the Rant.

quote:

was just curious how they would've done if they were here when the divisions formed.

Killz said it best for the 90s; we weren't good ('98 we were OK). '05 on we're decent except '12. '07 was our best team offensively; kind of like Auburn in 2013 except with the passing game...we were lethal except against OU and those racist bastards
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:48 am to
MrTwoBits

I just explained it to you but you seem to be ignoring my incredible post.

Are you pushing for a narrative trap? Hmmmmm?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter