Started By
Message
re: How would Missouri have fared if both new teams came in in '92?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:37 am to MrTwoBits
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:37 am to MrTwoBits
quote:
After every single other reply in the thread was legitimate, why did you choose to be the first to deviate from that?
2 reasons - I think Killz summed up the 90s best and because I'm tired of the "blue bloods" whining on why they couldn't win the past 2 years.....the sun was in our eyes, we got sand in our vaginas, we were Richted up, blah blah blah.
2
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:38 am to Wtodd
quote:
I'm tired of the "blue bloods" whining on why they couldn't win the past 2 years
Who's whining? I was very clear in the OP that missouri has done remarkably well in the SEC, and was just curious how they would've done if they were here when the divisions formed.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:46 am to Wtodd
They were actually pretty good in the first half if the 80s. The long walk in the desert didn't start until 84 or 85.
Larry Smith also fielded a couple decent teams in the late 90s. But not good enough to compete for SEC East.
I'd guess they would have won it in 07, had a Puncher's chance in 10,and little to no chance other years.
Larry Smith also fielded a couple decent teams in the late 90s. But not good enough to compete for SEC East.
I'd guess they would have won it in 07, had a Puncher's chance in 10,and little to no chance other years.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News