re: How would Missouri have fared if both new teams came in in '92?

quote:

---

'98 probably would have eligible

---

The only reason I counted '98 as the same is because UT went undefeated and won the national title. Idk how strong missouri was in 98 but I just kind of assumed that UT would still win the division.

quote:

---

'06 was our turnaround, and it looks like the east minus UF might have been down.

---

I think that's fair. SC was still bad (this was early under spurrier), UGA was in a transition era, and UT was coming to the end of fulmer.

quote:

---

'07 would have crushed the east

---

I can see that. UF wasn't that good that year. UT won the east but never looked great. UGA ended up great (finished #2) but they had some head scratchers early, losing to SC and UT.

quote:

---

'08 competitive, '09 was a down year.

---

I feel pretty safe in saying UF would have still won both years, we were really, really good both years.

quote:

---

'10 was the year when we had an amazing 9 games, and pissed down our leg in a few.

---

Y'all probably take the east that year. SC was pretty much the only east team worth anything.