Started By
Message

re: How would Missouri have fared if both new teams came in in '92?

Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:24 am to
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Going back to the OP, would you as a mizzou fan say that the 90s probably would have seen no change? Also what are your thoughts on how missouri would stack up from 2000-2011?



Well I answered the 90s part. We would've been garbage.

From 2000 - 2011 we would've mirrored our record in the Big 12.

South Carolina was terrible until about 4 years ago. Kentucky has always been terrible. Vandy...terrible. That's 3 wins right there which would've put us with at least 7 wins per season considering our out-of-conference victories.

Then, in true Mizzou fashion we would upset at least one true "power team" from the East (Tennessee, Georgia, Florida) each year which would put us at 8 total victories each season.

Then on a good year (Chase Daniels as QB) coupled with at least one power team from the East having a slightly off year, we'd perhaps win the East or end the season with 10 or 11 victories.

You must understand that since Pinkel has been coaching at Mizzou, we've owned Texas A&M. There's a reason College Station is referred to as Faurot Field South. Therefore, assuming that Mizzou would have played A&M for the first 3 years just like we did when we came to the SEC in 2012...you can add another victory to each season.

Therefore, my hypothesis is solid and I stand by it 100 percent.

This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 10:30 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter