90's minus '98 were god awful. '98 probably would have eligible. Early 2000's were getting better, but was obviously a UF/UT/UGA stronghold. '06 was our turnaround, and it looks like the east minus UF might have been down. '07 would have crushed the east. '08 competitive, '09 was a down year. '10 was the year when we had an amazing 9 games, and pissed down our leg in a few. '11 wasnt anything special.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by MrTwoBits

Member since Oct 2013

657 posts

Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:24 am to 5thTiger

quote:
'98 probably would have eligible

The only reason I counted '98 as the same is because UT went undefeated and won the national title. Idk how strong missouri was in 98 but I just kind of assumed that UT would still win the division.

quote:
'06 was our turnaround, and it looks like the east minus UF might have been down.

I think that's fair. SC was still bad (this was early under spurrier), UGA was in a transition era, and UT was coming to the end of fulmer.

quote:
'07 would have crushed the east

I can see that. UF wasn't that good that year. UT won the east but never looked great. UGA ended up great (finished #2) but they had some head scratchers early, losing to SC and UT.

quote:
'08 competitive, '09 was a down year.

I feel pretty safe in saying UF would have still won both years, we were really, really good both years.

quote:
'10 was the year when we had an amazing 9 games, and pissed down our leg in a few.

Y'all probably take the east that year. SC was pretty much the only east team worth anything.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ChewyDante

Member since Jan 2007

16931 posts

Posted on 3/12/15 at 10:05 am to 5thTiger

quote:
'07 would have crushed the east.

I'd pump the brakes there. Georgia, UT, and Florida were all solid in '07. Even your good teams are going to have a serious struggle in this conference in those kind of years.

This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 10:06 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by WorkinDawg