Started By
Message

re: How would Missouri have fared if both new teams came in in '92?

Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:16 am to
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:16 am to
We were garbage in the 80s and early 90s due to a President who wanted to destroy the athletic department and focus solely on academics. She was a bitch.
Posted by MrTwoBits
Member since Oct 2013
657 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:17 am to
quote:

We were garbage in the 80s and early 90s


When did your program turn around? Pinkel has been there since early 2000s is that right?

Going back to the OP, would you as a mizzou fan say that the 90s probably would have seen no change? Also what are your thoughts on how missouri would stack up from 2000-2011?
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 9:49 am to

more like from the mid 80s through all of the 90's.

also the run against A&M, is more recent, it didn't start until around 07
Posted by WorkinDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
9341 posts
Posted on 3/12/15 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

We were garbage in the 80s and early 90s due to a President who wanted to destroy the athletic department and focus solely on academics. She was a bitch.


As a rule- women in control ='s bad things for football and basketball.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter