Started By
Message
re: Jordan Clarkson
Posted on 3/10/15 at 9:06 am to 5thTiger
Posted on 3/10/15 at 9:06 am to 5thTiger
quote:
quote:
Offensively yes but neither could spell defense.
This. And the fact that no one plays defense in the NBA until the 4th quarter or playoffs.
Not true.
Anyway, you could see Clarksin's talent here but he played terribly inefficient while he was on the court and took a ton of bad shots.
2
Posted on 3/10/15 at 9:43 am to JesusQuintana
If players in the NBA played legitimate defense, we would not see consistent scores in the 100+ range.
In the 2013-14 season: Of the 30 teams that season... 17 averaged over 100 ppg. Of those 30 teams, 16 made the playoffs. 14 of the 16 playoff teams saw their PPG averages drop.
In the 2013-14 season: Of the 30 teams that season... 17 averaged over 100 ppg. Of those 30 teams, 16 made the playoffs. 14 of the 16 playoff teams saw their PPG averages drop.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:28 am to JesusQuintana
Jabari was probably the better player here. If Pressey would have stayed that team would have made the tourney. Clarkson has an NBA body. He never played D here and forced way too many shots. I'm not going to look it up, but I would venture to say that his assist/ TO ratio was probably very bad. Nobody ever said he couldn't score. On a side note the lakers are 16-46. The question is can he win games. Thus far the answer is a big no. I wish him well because hopefully he speaks well of Mizzou, but was never a big fan of his. He gave effort on offense, none on defense and took bad shots all the time. Hence fitting well in the NBA.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News