Started By
Message

re: ESPN Positional Weighted Averages Combined Overall Rankings

Posted on 2/27/15 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42657 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 1:27 pm to
You double weighted QB? If you do that, I feel like you should double weight OL as well because it doesn't really matter if your QB doesn't have time to throw, or your RB space to run.
This post was edited on 2/27/15 at 2:11 pm
Posted by yellowhammer2098
New Orleans, LA
Member since Mar 2013
3850 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 1:29 pm to
Print the shirts!
Posted by Ericvol2096
Charleston, SC
Member since May 2013
2588 posts
Posted on 2/27/15 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

You double weighted QB? If you do that? I feel like you should double weight OL as well because it doesn't really matter if your QB doesn't have time to throw, or your RB space to run.


Thanks for the thoughtful response.

I struggled with that, but a great QB can make a bad OL look average and so can an elite RB.

For example TN's OL gave up 32 sacks I belive in the first 8 games of the season when Worley was QB. Then the last 5 only gave up 8ish once Dobbs came in.

So I do think QB is fairly weighted the most.

OL and DL def should be higher than the other positions.

Is that logic good with you?
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 3/2/15 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

You double weighted QB?



double weighting seems to be the vol way...


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter