Started By
Message

re: Do you think the Civil War was started over slavery?

Posted on 2/17/15 at 10:27 am to
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33395 posts
Posted on 2/17/15 at 10:27 am to
quote:

flat out no way 25% of southerners owned slaves...


That's the entire South. In some states 50% of the white population owned slaves.

Posted by everytrueson
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Mar 2012
5915 posts
Posted on 2/17/15 at 10:35 am to
quote:

That's the entire South. In some states 50% of the white population owned slaves.



That is not true. Between 5-10% owned slaves, which included Indians and other Blacks. Look it up.
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 2/17/15 at 10:49 am to
Slavery was certainly a major issue in the Civil War. The North was more of a manufacturing area, while the South was more agricultural. The textile industry in the North couldn't survive without the cotton from the South. The South's slavery allowed them to have cheaper labor, and thus sell a cheaper product to Europe. Economically it would have killed the North. Also, the idea that states rights should carry over into the North was a big issue.

The North knew that if the war went on too long that England and France would help the South for economic reasons. Thus the blockades of ports by the Union navy.

So, basically yeah, it was all about slavery....and everything that stemmed from it.
Posted by NewbombII
Member since Nov 2014
4731 posts
Posted on 2/17/15 at 12:30 pm to
Please post a citation for one of these states where 50% of the pop owned slaves...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter