Started By
Message
re: Arguments against Gay marriage
Posted on 2/9/15 at 10:26 pm to Patton
Posted on 2/9/15 at 10:26 pm to Patton
Its just not biologically correct. Humans as well as all living things only purposes are to survive and reproduce. Homosexuality completely disrupts the our biological purpose. With that being said, however, I couldn't care less how somebody else decides to live their life so long as it doesn't affect me.
What grinds my gears is many people don't just want tolerance, they want to change people's way of thinking that being gay is a good thing. I can be tolerant of something and still not agree that it is right.
What grinds my gears is many people don't just want tolerance, they want to change people's way of thinking that being gay is a good thing. I can be tolerant of something and still not agree that it is right.
5
Posted on 2/9/15 at 10:43 pm to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Its just not biologically correct. Humans as well as all living things only purposes are to survive and reproduce. Homosexuality completely disrupts the our biological purpose.
I see that you're not familiar with real empirical-based science, which isn't surprising. You probably believe that the universe is 6000 years old. If homosexuality completely disrupts our biological purpose, then why is there homosexuality?
Before you continue with your illogical rebuttal, let me introduce you to the "god of the gap" fallacy which details that just because you can't explain it with science doesn't mean that they're clothing stores.
All in all, as many peer reviewed scientific articles would detail(which I don't need to reference here). Homosexuality is the next step in our species' collective evolution, one step between asexual reproduction and eventual singularity.
Posted on 2/9/15 at 10:46 pm to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Homosexuality completely disrupts the our biological purpose
Homos make up like less then 2% of the U.S. population. Them (only dude gays, not females) not having biological children doesn't disrupt anything. How could it possibly affect you?
I get that you don't think its right, based on your own personal moral code, that's cool. I just don't see being gay as a good, or bad, thing. It's just a thing.
This thread is semi serious. I don't think I have ever seen a legitimate non-religious argument against queer marriage. Does one exist?
Posted on 2/10/15 at 7:16 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
What grinds my gears is many people don't just want tolerance, they want to change people's way of thinking that being gay is a good thing. I can be tolerant of something and still not agree that it is right.
quote:
religion is the only argument against it and religion should have nothing to do with government. Let the churches recognize the term marriage and let the government recognize unions and go on about their day.
Some good stuff already posted.
This post was edited on 2/10/15 at 7:19 am
Posted on 2/10/15 at 7:57 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
What grinds my gears is many people don't just want tolerance, they want to change people's way of thinking that being gay is a good thing. I can be tolerant of something and still not agree that it is right.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:10 am to MSUbulldogs03
quote:
Its just not biologically correct. Humans as well as all living things only purposes are to survive and reproduce. Homosexuality completely disrupts the our biological purpose. With that being said, however, I couldn't care less how somebody else decides to live their life so long as it doesn't affect me.
What grinds my gears is many people don't just want tolerance, they want to change people's way of thinking that being gay is a good thing. I can be tolerant of something and still not agree that it is right.
this is where i parked my subaru.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News