Started By
Message
re: Should the NCAA let kids transfer without penalty if they can prove the a coach
Posted on 2/9/15 at 5:58 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
Posted on 2/9/15 at 5:58 pm to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:You're attempting to troll, but that is the actual issue. And it doesn't have to be LSU vs A&M.
In that case, why couldn't LSU just recruit a talented QB to begin with, instead of messing with transfers?
Oh wait. Nevermind ...
Team A (LSU in this case) is strong but badly needs 1 player. Team B (A&M) has a player that has proven he fits the bill, but is hard-pressed to compete with Team A even with that guy.
So- Team A raids Team B for the player. He starts, Team A does in fact win, and the pathway is there.
Team B can get players, but until and unless they have a breakout season (hard to do continuously replacing 1 yr starters), they will be under siege by the upper echelon teams. B's coach can try to sell the QB that he will bring in a new defensive coach to fix things, but that requires a bunch of players on defense to all do better... or else the QB can move elsewhere where things are in place, and step right into a better spot (for him).
1
Posted on 2/9/15 at 6:14 pm to Scoob
Oh, ok. I thought you were trolling as well. So you were being serious...
I don't think the transfer rules once a player is in the program is really the issue here. Teams still get players to transfer even with the "sit out a year" rule.
This is more about lying to recruits In order to get them on campus to begin with. That false pretense could nullify the LOI
I don't think the transfer rules once a player is in the program is really the issue here. Teams still get players to transfer even with the "sit out a year" rule.
This is more about lying to recruits In order to get them on campus to begin with. That false pretense could nullify the LOI
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News