Started By
Message

re: Which team is most responsible for Georgia's demise?

Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:54 pm to
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:54 pm to
UGA hasn't had a demise, I think people figured with the explosion of Metro Atlanta and the recruiting talent in state that they'd have more titles by now, but they've had 2-3 years when they were on the cusp.

It isn't like they have been going 7-5.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 1:55 pm
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86597 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

UGA hasn't had a demise, I think people figured with the explosion of Metro Atlanta and the recruiting talent in state that they'd have more titles by now, but they've had 2-3 years when they were on the cusp.

It isn't like they have been going 7-5.


A sensible post, thanks.

If UGA had been on a several decade romp through every conference just laying waste to people left and right and racking up titles...ok yeah we're in a demise. But from 1984 to 2001 we have been an extremely average team (for a number of reasons). The era that we're in now is actually pretty solid, and if you look at Richt's tenure as a whole it's probably one of (if not the most) successful runs UGA has ever had.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter