Started By
Message
re: Which team is most responsible for Georgia's demise?
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:54 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:54 pm to SummerOfGeorge
UGA hasn't had a demise, I think people figured with the explosion of Metro Atlanta and the recruiting talent in state that they'd have more titles by now, but they've had 2-3 years when they were on the cusp.
It isn't like they have been going 7-5.
It isn't like they have been going 7-5.
This post was edited on 2/3/15 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 2/3/15 at 1:57 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
UGA hasn't had a demise, I think people figured with the explosion of Metro Atlanta and the recruiting talent in state that they'd have more titles by now, but they've had 2-3 years when they were on the cusp.
It isn't like they have been going 7-5.
A sensible post, thanks.
If UGA had been on a several decade romp through every conference just laying waste to people left and right and racking up titles...ok yeah we're in a demise. But from 1984 to 2001 we have been an extremely average team (for a number of reasons). The era that we're in now is actually pretty solid, and if you look at Richt's tenure as a whole it's probably one of (if not the most) successful runs UGA has ever had.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News