Started By
Message

re: OSU playoff victory & second hand smoke

Posted on 1/21/15 at 4:33 pm to
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 1/21/15 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Second hand smoke is real...


Sure it is...just not something that causes you to test positive. Has anyone ever failed a drug screen and not used that excuse?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/21/15 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Has anyone ever failed a drug screen and not used that excuse?
Those who fail the cocaine portion. That would be great. Either it was "second hand sniffing" or "I was just hanging out around some people who were smoking crack"
This post was edited on 1/21/15 at 4:41 pm
Posted by Killean
Port Charlotte, FL
Member since Nov 2010
4669 posts
Posted on 1/21/15 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Current research has shown that passive exposure may result in low level positives (up to about 30 ng/ml) if the exposure conditions are severe enough. That means heavy smoke in a confined, non-ventilated space for an extended period of time. The data also suggests that THC is not likely to be detectable for more than about 24 hours after such exposure. It is unlikely that most people would tolerate the extreme conditions necessary to produce a positive result from passive exposure. The federal guidelines for work place testing have reduced the cutoff level for positive results from 100 ng/ml to 50 ng/ml, because it can be safely assumed that levels exceeding 50 ng/ml represent use of THC rather than exposure to side stream smoke.



LINK


So people will stop talking out of their respective asses...


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter