Started By
Message
Alabama's 2015 Offensive Depth Chart is stacked, but I have a question
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:03 pm
First of all, this isn't a damn bragging thread. This isn't about arguing over who got who or any of that. 42-35, 23 -17 (10), ok we've got that out of the way.
I'm legitimately wondering if any team, from a recruiting stand point, has ever had this somewhere on their offensive depth chart:
#1 DT QB
#1 RB X2
#1 WR X2
#1 TE
#1 OT
#1 JUCO OT
#1 OG
#1 OC
Again, this doesn't need to be a pissing match. This doesn't need to be a flame fest. I'm just wondering, thank you for anyone who is willing to actually answer.
I'm thinking maybe USCw did it a few years ago, but I don't know.
I'm legitimately wondering if any team, from a recruiting stand point, has ever had this somewhere on their offensive depth chart:
#1 DT QB
#1 RB X2
#1 WR X2
#1 TE
#1 OT
#1 JUCO OT
#1 OG
#1 OC
Again, this doesn't need to be a pissing match. This doesn't need to be a flame fest. I'm just wondering, thank you for anyone who is willing to actually answer.
I'm thinking maybe USCw did it a few years ago, but I don't know.
This post was edited on 1/9/15 at 1:05 pm
15
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:05 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Wasn't your 2011 or 2012 class supposedly the best ever?
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:07 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
First of all, this isn't a damn bragging thread.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:09 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
First of all, this isn't a damn bragging thread.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:12 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
this doesn't need to be a pissing match.
So you are saying it can be.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:13 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
take the crimson goggles off.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:14 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
USC comes to mind
Miami was more talented in the early 2000s, but I think their genius was more in the evaluation process beating the recruiting rankings. Recruiting rankings also weren't popular at that time so it's tough to say.
Miami was more talented in the early 2000s, but I think their genius was more in the evaluation process beating the recruiting rankings. Recruiting rankings also weren't popular at that time so it's tough to say.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:14 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Since college football is over 100 years old I am sure it has been done before.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:14 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Since college football is over 100 years old I am sure it has been done before.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:17 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Who's the number 1 OT and #1 wr x2, #1 rbx2?
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:21 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
this isn't a damn bragging thread.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:49 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
First of all, this isn't a damn bragging thread
Posted on 1/9/15 at 1:55 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
When the guys at rivals split, there was talk of Bama recruits getting a bump. Don't know if they were just butthurt about those guys starting 247, but some of the 5* bama has got have been average. I am not sure if some of your DBs could even start at most schools.
Posted on 1/9/15 at 2:15 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
:cheers:
ETA: :cheers:
This post was edited on 1/9/15 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 1/9/15 at 7:25 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
How many of those players were overrated? I know OJ Howard has never lived up to being the #1 tight end
This post was edited on 1/9/15 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 10:07 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
Nice highschool team rankings. Now lets wait til they actually do something in college before we label them the number 1 at anything
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News