Started By
Message
re: How was this not targeting?
Posted on 1/3/15 at 8:35 am to VADawg
Posted on 1/3/15 at 8:35 am to VADawg
quote:
quote:
I don't know what you're talking about. Nothing to see there.
That was a common theme throughout the Oregon/FSU game. Oregon has mastered the art of holding when the refs aren't looking.
Most of the national media got what the wanted: basically a Rose Bowl NC game between the Pac12 and the Big10. Another factor is the refs were letting Oregon snap the ball before the dang chains were even set. In addition to the advantage in pace this gives their offense it also means that the refs are rushed and not in position to make calls. I personally think its fricked up an not good for football. The offense already has the advantage of knowing the play/point of attack and are having to expend less effort accordingly. Frankly I think there should be mandatory time for the defense to substitute regardless of whether the offense subs or not.
1
Posted on 1/3/15 at 8:40 am to davesdawgs
quote:
Frankly I think there should be mandatory time for the defense to substitute regardless of whether the offense subs or not.
You get 6 timeouts per game, use whenever you want. If your defense is on the rails and you need to make some adjustments, you call a time out. If a defensive player gets hurt, and you need to sub, the refs stop the clock for you, and it doesn't count against your time outs.
Duuuuuuuuh
Page 1 of 1
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News