Started By
Message

re: How was this not targeting?

Posted on 1/3/15 at 8:25 am to
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45060 posts
Posted on 1/3/15 at 8:25 am to
quote:

I don't know what you're talking about. Nothing to see there.


That was a common theme throughout the Oregon/FSU game. Oregon has mastered the art of holding when the refs aren't looking.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 1/3/15 at 8:35 am to
quote:

quote:
I don't know what you're talking about. Nothing to see there.


That was a common theme throughout the Oregon/FSU game. Oregon has mastered the art of holding when the refs aren't looking.



Most of the national media got what the wanted: basically a Rose Bowl NC game between the Pac12 and the Big10. Another factor is the refs were letting Oregon snap the ball before the dang chains were even set. In addition to the advantage in pace this gives their offense it also means that the refs are rushed and not in position to make calls. I personally think its fricked up an not good for football. The offense already has the advantage of knowing the play/point of attack and are having to expend less effort accordingly. Frankly I think there should be mandatory time for the defense to substitute regardless of whether the offense subs or not.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter