Started By
Message
re: SEC needs the state of Alabama...not the other way around
Posted on 12/31/14 at 10:37 pm to FourThreeForty
Posted on 12/31/14 at 10:37 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
How does it make you feel that the last two SEC Champions had converted skill players at QB? Hope y'all enjoy watching the big boys of the SEC plaster the best that the B1G has to offer.
Funny, because I remember a time when the SEC was based around LSU, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida and Alabama was fricking irrelevant.
It's cyclical, your time to suck again will come.
3
Posted on 12/31/14 at 10:56 pm to DrSteveBrule
SEC
W L T W% Champ
1 Alabama 850–324–43 .716 24 15
2 Tennessee 810–367–54 .680 13 6
3 LSU 762–400–47 .650 11 3
4 Georgia 777–410–54 .648 12 2
5 Auburn 742–420–47 .633 8 2
6 Florida 690–400–40 .628 8 3
7 Texas A&M 709–461–48 .602 0 3
8 Arkansas 691–479–40 .588 0 1
9 Mississippi 645–500–35 .561 6 3
10 Missouri 662–534–53 .551 0 0
11 South Carolina 584–552–44 .514 0 0
12 Vanderbilt 585–591–50 .498 0 0
13 Kentucky 588–598–44 .496 2 1
14 Mississippi State 532–557–39 .489 1 0
..............................................
"Funny, because I remember a time when the SEC was based around LSU, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida and Alabama was fricking irrelevant."
Really?
W L T W% Champ
1 Alabama 850–324–43 .716 24 15
2 Tennessee 810–367–54 .680 13 6
3 LSU 762–400–47 .650 11 3
4 Georgia 777–410–54 .648 12 2
5 Auburn 742–420–47 .633 8 2
6 Florida 690–400–40 .628 8 3
7 Texas A&M 709–461–48 .602 0 3
8 Arkansas 691–479–40 .588 0 1
9 Mississippi 645–500–35 .561 6 3
10 Missouri 662–534–53 .551 0 0
11 South Carolina 584–552–44 .514 0 0
12 Vanderbilt 585–591–50 .498 0 0
13 Kentucky 588–598–44 .496 2 1
14 Mississippi State 532–557–39 .489 1 0
..............................................
"Funny, because I remember a time when the SEC was based around LSU, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida and Alabama was fricking irrelevant."
Really?
Posted on 12/31/14 at 11:01 pm to DrSteveBrule
quote:
Funny, because I remember a time when the SEC was based around LSU, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida and Alabama was fricking irrelevant.
It's cyclical, your time to suck again will come.
I assume you're discussing 1997-2007. The time period in which Alabama had three ten win seasons and an SEC championship, which was the second worst period in team history. How does it feel to know that LSU at its best is barely better than Bama at its worst?
Posted on 12/31/14 at 11:48 pm to DrSteveBrule
quote:
Funny, because I remember a time when the SEC was based around LSU, Tennessee, Georgia and Florida and Alabama was fricking irrelevant.
That was, like, for about 15 minutes. The SEC has always revolved around Bama, and AU to a lesser extent.
I doubt that a single state has had the run for consecutive NCG appearances that the state of Alabama has had the last five or six years.
Unprecedented.
This post was edited on 12/31/14 at 11:53 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News