Started By
Message
re: SEC 2000-2009 or 2010-current
Posted on 12/18/14 at 5:31 pm to dawgdayafternoon
Posted on 12/18/14 at 5:31 pm to dawgdayafternoon
2000-2009 the SEC had Tennessee, Florida, LSU, Georgia as the "elite" teams Auburn, Arkansas, Ole Miss as the "good" teams (over various seasons)
2010-current has had Alabama, LSU as the "elite" teams and Georgia, Auburn, South Carolina as the "good" teams with A&M, Missouri bringing up rear mainly because they joined so recently.... Although Missouri could be considered "good" with 2 straight East titles.
2010-current has had Alabama, LSU as the "elite" teams and Georgia, Auburn, South Carolina as the "good" teams with A&M, Missouri bringing up rear mainly because they joined so recently.... Although Missouri could be considered "good" with 2 straight East titles.
3
Posted on 12/18/14 at 5:34 pm to tduecen
LSU didn't win a single natty and is "elite" after 2010? lol no
Posted on 12/18/14 at 6:10 pm to tduecen
quote:
Although Missouri could be considered "good" with 2 straight East titles.
Posted on 12/18/14 at 8:07 pm to tduecen
quote:
2000-2009 the SEC had Tennessee, Florida, LSU, Georgia as the "elite" teams Auburn, Arkansas, Ole Miss as the "good" teams (over various seasons)
2010-current has had Alabama, LSU as the "elite" teams and Georgia, Auburn, South Carolina as the "good" teams with A&M, Missouri bringing up rear mainly because they joined so recently.... Although Missouri could be considered "good" with 2 straight East titles.
Neither Edit UTk or UGA were elite in 2000-2009, Auburn had the best team of that stretch.
Auburn is elite currently BCS title, 2 SEC titles and another BCS title game. LSU is border line without a BCS title in that time frame.
This post was edited on 12/19/14 at 7:06 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News